Search for: All records

Abstract Idealized models are analyzed to quantify how large‐scale river plumes interact with coastal corners with and without wind‐driven currents. The configuration has a corner formed by two perpendicular shelves (with constant slope) that are joined with a coastal radius of curvature (r_c). The buoyant plume originates from an upstream point source. Ther_cand wind forcing are varied among runs. Steep‐ and gentle‐slope runs are compared for some situations. Without winds, plumes separate from corners withr_csmaller than two inertial radii (r_i); this threshold is twice ther_c < r_itheoretical separation criterion. After separation, no‐wind plumes form an anticyclonic bulge, and reattach farther downstream. Offshore excursion increases asr_cdecreases. A downwelling‐favorable wind component along the upstream coast (τ_sx) favors separation by increasing total plume speed. An upwelling‐favorable wind component along the downstream coast (τ_sy) also increases offshore excursion. Winds blowing obliquely offshore with both these wind components advect the plume farther offshore. Wind‐driven currents that steer plumes in this situation include a downshelf jet originating on the upstream shelf and continuing around the coastal corner and beyond, offshore and upshelf surface transport downstream of the corner, and surface Ekman transport on the outer shelf. Multiple linear regressions quantify plume position sensitivity tor_c,τ_sx, andτ_sy; results are discussed in a dynamical context. Globally, many river plumes interact with coastal corners under various wind conditions. 

Abstract The Connecticut River plume is influenced by energetic ambient tides in the Long Island Sound receiving waters. The objectives of this modeling study are (a) characterizing the spatial heterogeneity of turbulent buoyancy fluxes, (b) partitioning turbulent buoyancy fluxes into bottom‐generated and interfacial shear contributions, and (c) quantifying contributions to plume‐integrated mixing within the tidal plume. The plume formed during ambient flood tides under low river discharge, spring tides, and no winds is analyzed. Turbulent buoyancy fluxes (B) and depth‐integratedBthrough the plume (Bd) are characterized by pronounced spatial heterogeneity. Strong mixing (Bd∼ 10⁻⁵‐10⁻⁴ m³/s³) occurs near the mouth, in the nearfield plume turning region, over shoals, and nearshore shallow areas. Low to moderate mixing (Bd∼ 10⁻⁸‐10⁻⁶ m³/s³) occupies half the plume. Buoyancy fluxes are first partitioned based on the depth of the shear stress minimum between plume‐generated and bottom‐generated shear maxima. Four other tested partitioning methods are based on open channel flow and stratified shear flow parameterizations. Interfacial and bottom‐generated shear contribute to different areas of intense and moderate mixing. All methods indicate a significant plume mixing role for bottom‐generated mixing, but interfacial mixing is a bigger contributor. Plume‐integrated total and interfacial mixing peak at max ambient flood and the timing of peak bottom‐generated mixing varies among partitioning methods. Two‐thirds of the mixing occurs in concentrated intense mixing areas. A parameter space with the ambient tidal Froude number and plume thickness to depth ratio as axes indicates many tidally modulated plumes are moderately to dominantly influenced by bottom‐generated tidal mixing. 

Abstract Microstructure profiling was utilized to estimate vertical mixing (via vertical turbulent buoyancy flux) during a tidal pulse in the interior Merrimack River plume in calm winds. Multiple stratified shear mixing regimes appear and evolve with time. Initially the plume acts as a nearfield jet, with mixing in the plume (plume layer mixing) and over the plume‐ambient interface (nearfield interfacial mixing). As the plume grows, interfacial mixing is suppressed offshore of the nearfield as currents slow, diminishing turbulent exchange between plume and shelf. At the end of ebb, ambient tidal currents reverse direction below plume, initiating another mode of internal, interfacial mixing (coined here as tidal interfacial mixing), allowing exchange between plume and ambient waters offshore. This work highlights previously unreported tidally modulated mixing within the near and midfield of a river plume.